Here’s a free affirmative case for Stoa Team Policy debaters.
Read MoreThere are two persuasive approaches to deciding the order of contentions.
Read MoreWe’re breaking down the most common myths in LD value debate. Here’s part 1.
Read MoreCriterion: Excitement
Plan: The judge will set himself on fire and jump off a cliff.
In the current Stoa resolution, this is the obvious front-runner value. But not all justice is created equal. Here are eight possible definition types.
Read MoreAcademic debate offers resolutions with three different kinds of claims: value, fact, and policy. Understanding the difference between them allows you to craft your case with precision, and deliver your advocacy with accuracy.
Read MoreLast time we unpacked what values are, and then how to create them. Now we talk about how to run them...
Read MoreLogically, the first step to prove a resolution is to...
Read MoreMost economics classes begin by explaining the problem of...
Read MoreA good value meets three standards...
Read MoreIn the last post, I talked about Reference Points: a way to identify the starting point of any explanation.
The second step, logical chronology, tells you how to take your audience the rest of the way.
Logical Chronology
Logical Chronology is the act of presenting ideas...
Read MoreThere are two basic tools that make explanation possible. This post covers the first one:
Reference Points
Reference points are things that two people already know, like a shared language. This post is written in English, because I know that’s what you speak. If it were written in Swahili, it may still contain useful information, but it would probably be useless to you.
Beyond language...
Read MoreMany policy debaters treat evidence like rare silver, to where having more of it makes the case more valuable by default.
"I have 17 pieces of evidence in my 1AC!"
As a result, many policy cases are written with a primary emphasis on...
Read More