Topicality went from being a mainstream argument to a hated argument. Where does it fall now?
Read MoreIn the last post, we uncovered the problems with typical interpretations of finance policy.
Read MoreTwo of the terms are easy to define. The third one is hard.
Read MoreHere’s a free affirmative case for Stoa Team Policy debaters.
Read MoreWe’re diving into some policy theory on this one. Grab your snorkel!
Read MoreIt is virtually impossible to compete in academic debate without ever criticizing the country in which you live.
Read MoreLast time, we discussed three ways that the term “burden of proof” has been tortured beyond recognition. Today, we tackle the other three.
Read MoreLet’s break down what burden of proof isn’t – and then what it is.
Read More“Inherency is usually run about once a season on a team that is either incredibly unlucky or incredibly ill-prepared.”
Read MoreCounter-warrants are an advanced strategy. Here are three general templates you can use to set yours apart...
Read MoreWe've already talked about argument structure. Now we dive headfirst into something known as counter-warrant strategy.
Read MoreCross-ex is a fast-paced, dynamic battle in which the witness has...
Read MoreA voting issue (or “voter”) is a reason for the...
Read MoreDeductive reasoning (Betsy is a cow, all cows eat grass, therefore Betsy eats grass) is widely regarded as the most scientific...
Read MoreAn admission is something your opponent says that you can use against his advocacy. And of all your options, an opponent's admission is the strongest...
Read MoreThere are two basic tools that make explanation possible. This post covers the first one:
Reference Points
Reference points are things that two people already know, like a shared language. This post is written in English, because I know that’s what you speak. If it were written in Swahili, it may still contain useful information, but it would probably be useless to you.
Beyond language...
Read MoreMany policy debaters treat evidence like rare silver, to where having more of it makes the case more valuable by default.
"I have 17 pieces of evidence in my 1AC!"
As a result, many policy cases are written with a primary emphasis on...
Read More